• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

ASEE Computers in Education Journal

ASEE's Computers in Education Journal

  • Current Issue (V14-I3)
    • Engaging High School Teachers with Artificial Intelligence Concepts, Applications, and Developments
    • Virtual and Physical Robots in Engineering Education: A Study on Motivation and Learning with Augmented Reality
    • A Hybrid Physical-Virtual Educational Robotic Arm
    • How Pivoting to Remote and Online Teaching Impacted Biological and Biomedical Engineering Students Engagement
  • Vol. & Issues
  • About
  • Submissions
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Submission Site (2025+)
    • Re-submissions (Pre-2025)
  • Editorial Team
  • Recruitment
Home » Student Engagement

Student Engagement

A Hybrid Physical-Virtual Educational Robotic Arm

  • Paper (PDF)
    • HTML
    • XML
  • 10.18260/B2B3-8F-19313

Abstract

In the field of robotics education, introductory courses would ideally utilize heavy industrial arms for hands-on learning. This would provide students with valuable experience in joint programming, which involves direct control of each joint motor in the robotic arm to accomplish desired path planning and differential movements. This practice requires consideration of the physical properties of the large arm such as its large mass. However, the use of heavy industrial robotic arms has several drawbacks. They are large and expensive, require specialized maintenance, can pose safety risks, and they typically do not allow for direct control of the joint motors. The use of a small, lightweight, toy-like arm is not suitable since their lightweight construction means they do not exhibit behavior associated with heavier arms. Robotic arm simulators using a virtual arm doesn’t offer the same level of hands-on engagement and excitement as a physical arm.

Read the full article here “A Hybrid Physical-Virtual Educational Robotic Arm”

How Pivoting to Remote and Online Teaching Impacted Biological and Biomedical Engineering Students Engagement

  • Paper (PDF)
    • HTML
    • XML
  • 10.18260/B2B3-8F-36048

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of courses at all educational levels worldwide had to shift to remote teaching from face-to-face. Since the courses were not initially designed for online education, we need to understand the issues both students and instructors faced during this unplanned shift. Also, before the pandemic, only a portion of students had experience with online education, although it was successfully implemented in many different areas. This arbitrary shift provides an excellent opportunity for students to have an overall opinion about this course delivery method at a more significant ratio. This forced online learning experience offered potential opportunities (e.g., successful online lab experiences) and possible barriers (e.g., time, technology, mental health, limited interaction) that need further investigation. This paper presents the survey data collected during the Spring and Fall of 2020 from Biomedical/biological Engineering students to examine perceived barriers of online learning and impacts on course performance in order to provide support for students in the future online and remote experience.

Read the full article here “How Pivoting to Remote and Online Teaching Impacted Biological and Biomedical Engineering Students Engagement”

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Engaging High School Teachers with Artificial Intelligence Concepts, Applications, and Developments
  • Virtual and Physical Robots in Engineering Education: A Study on Motivation and Learning with Augmented Reality
  • A Hybrid Physical-Virtual Educational Robotic Arm
  • How Pivoting to Remote and Online Teaching Impacted Biological and Biomedical Engineering Students Engagement
  • On Building and Implementing Adaptive Learning Platform Lessons for Pre-Class Learning in a Flipped Course
  • PSpice Model of a Shunt DC Motor for Transient Performance Simulation and Its Use in Teaching

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Engineering Education. All rights reserved.